May 18, 2012

Spam wars: saving PR from itself

spam public relations

A campaign against the level of irrelevant material circulated by PRs has been launched under the heading ‘An Inconvenient PR Truth‘. And the associated findings do not make pretty reading for the industry.

Release distribution service RealWire (who are leading this latest campaign) launched a survey late last year to look at just how widespread the problem of press release spam really is.

Respondents were people who receive news releases on a daily basis, including journalists, editors, bloggers and publishers.

Levels of irrelevance

The report estimates that 1.7 billion irrelevant news release emails are received by UK and US journalists every year. The survey suggests that more than three quarters (78%) of news releases issued are not relevant to the recipient, and over half (55%) of respondents stated that they have blocked some distributors due to high levels of irrelevance.

The average number of news releases received per respondent per day was 54, but 18% of respondents receive over 100 releases a day. Most worryingly, 57% of respondents stated that 80% of the releases that they receive are irrelevant, whilst 23% said that a ludicrous 96% of releases received are irrelevant.

Acceptable levels of irrelevance

When it came to opinions on what constitutes acceptable levels of irrelevance, the results varied greatly. Whilst 37% stated that they would consider it acceptable if no more than half the releases they received were irrelevant, 27% considered it acceptable if less than 2 in 10 releases proved relevant.

Welcome topics

The survey also asked about what kind of news releases are popular, and which are unpopular. Whilst the most popular subjects include product and market-related releases, the unpopular topics cited included office openings, job appointments, awards, financial results, and client and/or customer wins.

The personal touch

Respondents were asked about their feelings when it came to how news releases are addressed – do they mind receiving something that has clearly been mass-mailed provided that it is relevant, or do they prefer emails that are addressed to them?

The survey’s results show that 25% of respondents prefer releases to be addressed to them and furthermore, that 33% prefer emails that come from a named individual.

Taking action

These findings won’t come as a surprise to many in the industry. Since the advent of technology that allows huge mailing lists to be created at the click of a button, online PR spam has been a serious issue.

Back in June, I blogged about a survey revealing the extent of PR spam:

Of course, it’s now relatively easy to set oneself up as a PR professional, buy access to a media database and start churning out releases in all directions. Spam exists in every industry – why should PR be any different? They say spam accounts for some 90-95% of all emails sent, so it’s not really surprising that journalists are being targeted.

There’s little doubt that spam is rife, and that it is eroding the PR industry’s ability to communicate effectively, so what does An Inconvenient PR Truth propose to do about it?

The Bill of Rights

In a bid to improve PR practice with regards to relevance, An Inconvenient PR Truth has released a ‘Bill of Rights’, arguing that the industry should address the research findings by respecting the rights of recipients, which include:

  • ‘Permission required’ – only send releases to those who have given permission directly or publicly.
  • ‘Timely unsubscribe’ – stop sending releases when asked.
  • ‘Don’t rely on media lists exclusively’ – research independently to target accurately.
  • ‘Read publication first’ – know what a person writes about and how before you approach them.
  • ‘Categorise interests in detail’ – don’t target broad categories such as ‘finance’ or ‘technology’

The campaign calls on all those in the industry to sign up to the bill, in the hope of improving irrelevance levels and reducing ‘pollution’ in the PR industry.

Will it work?

After chatting with @AdamVincenzini, @AdParker and @KerryMG about this on Twitter this morning, my feeling is that many people know they spam and don’t care. For that group, I doubt they’ll be moved from their old ways.

But for the young and/or naive who don’t know any better, this could help change perception, and with the backing of some leaders in the PR world, could improve the industry as a whole. Let’s hope so anyway.

To find out more about the campaign, visit An Inconvenient PR Truth.

Addition: There is an interesting post on how journalists could tackle the issue of PR spam over on Max Tatton-Brown’s blog.

Are you getting value from your PR agency?

Tick boxes

The latest update of the Bellwether Report, published today, shows that whilst marketing spend declined for the ninth quarter running, PR budgets saw a slower rate of decline in the final quarter of 2009 compared to the previous quarter – from 24.4% down to just 4%. The report also shows that the rate of budget trimming in the industry is at its slowest since the first quarter of 2008.

Whilst times are undoubtedly still tough, these results suggest the industry can be optimistic about the year ahead, with marketing spend predicted to increase in 2010.

For those in the PR industry, the report underlines the importance of providing a service that delivers strong results and offers value for money. Whilst the green shoots of recovery are perhaps starting to surface, the recession continues to hit people and businesses hard and there is no guarantee that the renewed optimism within the PR industry will be replicated elsewhere.

Despite these positive findings, the purse strings of the average UK business are still a lot tighter than they used to be when it comes to budgeting for PR and marketing campaigns, and many might well still opt for the cheapest option rather than best option in this climate.

For businesses tempted to engage the services of a PR agency, finding the balance between value and price can be tough. Before you leap on the cheapest option on the table, here are some questions to help put ‘value’ in perspective:

Is saving money worth the risk?

If a painter does a bad job, you can always get someone better in to make it as good as new. The risk involved in opting for the cheapest provider is relatively low. Not so in marketing, where the risk of damage is much greater.

Any PR work undertaken will reflect on both your product and your company as a whole, helping to determine their success or failure potentially well beyond the duration of the campaign.

Is the pricing of the service blinding you to the true value?

Some agencies might seem expensive, while others might seem cheap, but neither is necessarily an indication of the quality of the service they offer.

Look at each option on the table and consider the agency’s track record and exactly what they are offering first. Once you have a sense of the hierarchy of quality, compare this against the prices. Is the cheapest agency offering the lowest value? You might be surprised, but equally you might simply find proof of the old adage, “you get what you pay for.”

Can the potential return on investment justify a higher spend?

While larger companies tend to have a tried and tested formula for setting the budget around a product or service launch, many smaller firms will simply set their budget based on a combination of what they feel they can afford at the time, balanced against the mean cost put forward by competing providers.

When you have all of your quotes in front of you, assess the potential return from each proposed campaign. In many cases, getting value for money may mean spending more, but you will get a better return in terms of campaign reach, support and quality. Pound for pound, the value could be higher.

Put simply, when setting your marketing/PR budget this year, remember: you’re not just paying for the hours worked, you’re also paying for the contacts, the support, the experts and, most importantly, the results.

Emily Cagle Communications is recruiting

Crowd silhouette

We’re looking for the brightest rising star in the region to come and join our vibrant agency as we continue to win clients nationwide.

If you want to be part of an exciting, growing company, this could be the job for you.

Emily Cagle Communications specialises in public relations and copywriting. We’ve been trading for 14 months and are now looking for an experienced full-time PR account manager to join our team in Lincoln.

You’ll work at our bright, spacious offices in central Lincoln, getting hands-on with a host of exciting clients, ranging from tiny start-ups to established national brands.

You will have:

  • experience at account manager level
  • experience working with clients in the service industries, especially HR, legal and financial services
  • excellent attention to detail
  • accomplished writing skills
  • confident telephone manner and experience working with journalists
  • a good book of media contacts
  • an ability to take ownership of projects and drive them forward
  • a love of, and commitment to, public relations

In return, we can offer:

  • a competitive salary, based on experience
  • in-house and external training
  • a fun, fast-paced work environment

To apply, please send a covering letter of no more than 350 words along with your CV to info[at]emilycagle[dot]co[dot]uk.

We look forward to hearing from you.

The first and the last word in charity adoption

Words

As is pretty obvious from the title of this blog, words are my business. I spend most of my waking hours choosing them carefully, writing them out, looking back through them, talking them through with colleagues, clients and friends, tweaking an adjective here and an imperative there to (hopefully) produce the perfect copy.

So, when I came across the Adopt a Word initiative that allows you to ‘adopt’ a word for charity, my first thought was, “What word shall I get?” and my second was, “What a great idea!”

I’ve written about fundraising and the importance of a theme/activity that inspires people before, and the Adopt a Word concept strikes me as a little bit of genius. Everyone I mentioned it to knew immediately which word or words they wanted most.

Head over to the Adopt a Word website and you’ll see that this project has plenty going for it: a concept you can get on board with, a worthy cause, celebrity endorsement (lots of), and even merchandise to show off your newly adopted word.

All funds raised go to I CAN, the creators of the project. I CAN is the children’s communication charity, which aims to ensure that no child is left behind because of a difficulty speaking or understanding.

Its mission:

“To make sure that everyone in contact with children knows how important communication is, what a communication problem looks like, and what they can do to help.”

So, the core concept – words – is very closely tied to the charity it supports. The Adopt a Word concept gets prospective donors thinking about words, and realising how much they value communication, which helps to highlight the importance of the I CAN cause – excellent stuff.

Clare Horwood
, Head of Individual Giving 
at I CAN,
 was kind enough to run me through the background to the project:

“Adopt a Word is one of our fundraising campaigns to raise money from individuals. Alternative gifts are a great way for charities to increase their donations, but it’s a fairly crowded market.

“Obviously, we can’t use goats or pandas so words, which are at the heart of our cause and the building blocks of communication were the natural choice.

“By putting words up for adoption we hope to make their importance understood in the context of children with communication difficulties. Also, because words have such a broad appeal it means we can extend our reach beyond the traditional donor and way out into the twitterverse!”

The initiative has been running since October 2008, but recently received a boost when Stephen Fry purchased ‘wordy’, sparking a flood of donations. I think with another push on social media and via more traditional marketing and PR channels, it could receive much wider exposure.

Adopt a Word’s Twitter persona (@adoptaword) is starting to make waves but as with any initiative, there will be areas for improvement and the guys at I CAN are (unsurprisingly) great to communicate with, so I’m betting all suggestions are welcome.

Personally, I have suggested adding PayPal as a payment option and adding a button so that people can push a message to Twitter about their adoption. What do you think?

(Thank you to @reedwords for making me aware of this. And in case you’re wondering, I bought ‘social’)

adoptaword_final_rgb

Great expectations: getting real about sponsorship

Blank billboard

Today, MarketingDonut.co.uk have kindly published my guest post on maintaining realistic expectations when sponsoring a cause, event or initiative.

Here’s an excerpt:

At this point, you might start seeking coverage in your own industry’s ‘trade publications’, but here’s a warning:

In most cases, the media simply don’t view sponsorships themselves as newsworthy.

Visit “Expose yourself properly: No story means no PR” now to read the full post.

UK-based marketing and PR resources on Twitter

Library of resources

For the last couple of weeks, I’ve been looking at Twitter accounts associated with UK business resources. Today, I’m looking at UK-based marketing and PR publications on Twitter.

Many small business owners are managing their own marketing activity, so following these Twitter accounts can offer a great source of information and inspiration.

  • @prweekuknews – This is the (seemingly unofficial) feed for the UK edition of PRWeek, the source for news and analysis surrounding public relations. Follow this account for updates and links to stories as they are published. This is an automated feed though, so there’s no chatting to be had.
  • @BrandRepublic – Brand Republic covers online advertising, marketing, media and PR. This is mostly an automated feed, but there’s some conversation in between the headlines. (Update: On 29th July, @BrandRepublic announced that they’re replacing the auto-feed with links to just “the best news and blog posts.” Good news, I say!)
  • @TheDrum -  An online resource covering advertising, design, media, marketing and PR. Again, the account chiefly posts links to headlines on the site but is slightly more interactive than most, with opportunities to ask questions and suggest content.
  • @utalkmarketing – The UTalkmarketing website is a merry mix of marketing news, case studies, opinion pieces and how-to guides. Follow this account for a heads up when new articles are posted.
  • @MarketingWeekEd – This is a pure news feed for Marketing Week, one of the UK’s leading marketing publications. Again, it’s hard to tell if this one is official, but it’s an effective way as any to keep abreast of the latest stories in the world of marketing.

And finally…I’ve mentioned these guys before in a previous Twitter post, but I can’t let a Twitter post on marketing go by without a mention for:

  • @MarketingDonut – Marketing Donut is a marketing resource website that publishes quality marketing advice and is completely accessible to non-marketers in style and content. They’ll also answer your burning marketing questions – just tweet.

That’s it for now.

Update: Twitter now offers its own marketing and customer service ‘how-to’ guide for businesses. It takes you through the basics, including key Twitter lingo, and offers tips on best practice. There are also case studies so you can learn how some big brands have leveraged the power of Twitter. Check out the Twitter101 guide for more information.

Twitter and ‘FollowFriday’

Follow footprints

Following in the footsteps of Twitter users such as @dannybrown, @nikkipilkington and the like, I’m moving my #followfriday recommendations over to my blog.

This week, I’m recommending @prsarahevans and @MarketingDonut.

Sarah’s blog is a very useful resource for those interested in communications and social media, with lots of advice and commentary to get you thinking and acting. Sarah is also involved in a number of projects that are a must see for anyone trying to establish their brand through social media (see namechk.com and MediaOnTwitter).

@MarketingDonut is the Twitter persona of marketing resource website, The Marketing Donut. It’s packed full of marketing advice, aimed specifically at small businesses and broken down into bite-sized chunks of under 300 words. Undeniably useful stuff.

That’s it. More next week.

Update: Twitter now offers its own marketing and customer service ‘how-to’ guide for businesses. It takes you through the basics, including key Twitter lingo, and offers tips on best practice. There are also case studies so you can learn how some big brands have leveraged the power of Twitter. Check out the Twitter101 guide for more information.

PR: Practically (Ir)Relevant?

Newspapers

According to holdthefrontpage.co.uk, journalists consider less than 10% of the PR material they receive to be relevant to them:

Most PR material ‘irrelevant’ say journalists

Two thirds of journalists want to receive less material from the commercial PR sector according to the preliminary results of an online survey.

[...] Early results have shown that half the respondents consider less than 10pc of the content delivered to them by the commercial PR sector is relevant and that two-thirds of them want to receive less such material.

When I read the report, my first thought was that the findings themselves are a little weak in the PR stakes – a great headline but not much content. There’s little information in the report about a) the number of respondents and b) how broadly representative that sample is of journalists in general. So, ironically, the piece may be guilty of exactly what makes so much PR just hot air: a lack of credible numbers to back it up.

Of course, it’s now relatively easy to set oneself up as a PR professional, buy access to a media database and start churning out releases in all directions. Spam exists in every industry – why should PR be any different? They say spam accounts for some 90-95% of all emails sent, so it’s not really surprising that journalists are being targeted.

The real issue is this: are experienced PR professionals who should know better putting out hardly relevant and barely interesting information en masse? Well yes, some are. Do they make up the majority? Actually, I think not.

Remember, a PR person’s job is to get coverage. Very few, if any, of us are being paid simply to spew out information. It has to find a voice in a media that is then heard by the client’s target audience. Spam won’t achieve that, so I find it hard to believe it’s a practice that’s dominating mainstream PR activity.

Of course, I can see why a journalist on the receiving end of hundreds of time-wasting emails and calls per day would think differently.

Four things to consider when preparing a marketing brief

Tick boxes

Over the years, I’ve worked on a range of marketing and communications projects and have often found that the campaigns that deliver exceptional results are those that start out on the solid foundations of a clear brief.

It is not unusual for a client to be uncertain about exactly what it is they require but, in my opinion, it is part of the marcom (marketing communications) provider’s role to help develop a clear brief on which both client and provider agree, ensuring that both sides are in agreement about why the project is being undertaken, what the desired outcomes are and how these will be measured in terms of clear deliverables.

If you are starting out in a relationship with a new marcom provider, here are four tips to help you create an effective brief:

1. Why?

At the outset of any marcom project, before any specific objectives are agreed upon, both parties should be absolutely clear on the answer to one simple question, “Why are we doing this?” An answer to this might be, “To make more people who use disposable razors aware of our eco-friendly, self-sharpening razors in order to sell more units.” If either side isn’t able to give a definite answer, or if those two answers don’t tally, you are not yet in a position to start planning your project.

2. Who?

Sometimes, a company will have an instinctive sense of who they want to target, sometimes they will be able to extract detailed customer data from their records in order to provide a profile of a typical buyer, but often, companies will have very little idea about who they wish to target, instead simply hoping to cast the net vaguely in the direction of a particular gender, social band or age group.

Targeting a campaign towards a defined audiences is important for a number of reasons. It allows publications to be targeted more intelligently, messages to be phrased according to specific tastes and understandings, and budgets to be used productively to reach out only to those likely to respond in a way that is beneficial to your end goals.

For example, The News of the World is the widest read UK newspaper, but its readership is unlikely to respond in high proportions to a new product for the trawler fishing industry. Instead, a trade journal or trawler fishing magazine, with its narrower target audience would be far more likely to provide a successful focus for the firm’s marketing efforts.

3. How and when?

Now you have a handle on your project’s overall aim, and know who you want to reach, you can start planning your objectives and agreeing upon deliverables. This is when the old ‘SMART’ chestnut comes in handy to help you shape your objectives.

To be useful to your project, every objective agreed upon must be Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Time-based. This means phrases like “increase orders per customer” are out. Instead, each objective must be qualified with specifics such as the number of sales you wish to secure per customer, and include a time-scale in which this will be achieved. Being realistic means assessing the company’s starting point and budgeting sensibly to ensure that both side’s resources and capabilities are sufficient to reach the goals set. Setting time-scales with interim deliverables is particularly important as it will help structure the project and ensure that you remain on track.

Of course, some objectives are harder to quantify than others, such as where the intention is to improve public and/or media perception of a brand. In such cases, it’s important that both parties agree on how this will be measured. For example, a public relations agency may need to demonstrate a way of assessing whether a news report about a company is positive, negative, or neutral and then show how this will be quantified to calculate the overall media image of the brand.

4. What?

What is it about your brand that you want your target audiences to know? Do you want to your company director to be seen as an expert in his field? Do you want your brand to be known as the strongest/cheapest/most eco-friendly of its kind? Do you want to emphasise your company’s commitment to sustainability? Do you want to be known as cool? Original? Ground-breaking?

If you’re struggling to answer these questions, start out by imagining you are at a networking event speaking to a potential customer: what are the three things you would want them to know about your product or service before they walk away? It’s not necessary to have a professional understanding of key messages and how they are communicated via the media or other marketing channels – your marcom provider can help you with that – but it is well worth thinking about these issues is simple terms so that you can go to your provider with a clear sense of what you want your audience to know about.

These four simple steps certainly won’t guarantee you marketing success, but they should provide you with a strong framework to take to your marketing, communications or PR agency to ensure they come back with a workable proposal that fulfils your expectations.

If you are planning to place an online advertisement for a marketing communications provider, you may also wish to read this post on writing effective project listings.

Ten books to help you get acquainted with PR and marketing

Stack of resources

If you’re interested in understanding the principles behind PR and marketing, here are ten books that will provide you with a solid introduction to those industries.

Public relations

Public Relations: An Introduction by Shirley Harrison – A simple introduction to the key concepts of PR, with a particularly useful section on crisis management.

Exploring Public Relations by Ralph Tench and Liz Yeomans – A comprehensive and clearly written account of major PR tools, theories and concepts.

PR 2.0: New Media, New Tools, New Audiences by Deirdre Breakenridge – A great introduction to the concept of PR2.0 with extensive case studies.

Putting the Public Back in Public Relations: How Social Media is Reinventing the Aging Business of PR by Brian Solis and Deirdre Breakenridge – A bang up-to-date analysis of the integration of social media into modern PR practices.

Marketing

Principles and Practice of Marketing by David Jobber – An effective look through key marketing concepts with plenty of examples and case studies.

Principles of Direct and Database Marketing by Alan Tapp – An enlightening explanation of the sometimes baffling theory of database marketing.

Marketing Management and Strategy by Doyle and Stern – A great resource for understanding marketing strategy on an international level.

Marketing Myopia (Harvard Business Review Classics) by Theodore Levitt – A look at marketing and customer orientated markets from the former editor of the Harvard Business Review.

Branding

Lovemarks by Kevin Roberts – Interesting argument in favour of ‘loving a brand’ from the CEO of Saatchi and Saatchi.

Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity by Kevin Lane Keller – A higher level text book on branding and strategic management.

You could also take a look at this guide to UK-based PR and marketing publications.

Slider by webdesign